World numbers of loose residing honey bees

Do free-living honey bee colonies actually outnumber controlled hives through 3:1? How was once this made up our minds, what assumptions had been made and why don’t I see occupied bushes after I’m out strolling?

Creation

Why are the copses, coppices and thickets of the United Kingdom (or for that subject Europe or a lot of North The united states) no longer stuffed with huge numbers of free-living honey bee nests?

As a biologist who has labored on Varroa and the devastating penalties of mite infestation my resolution could be that the creation of this ectoparasite to a honey bee inhabitants – whether or not controlled or free-living – supplies the rationale.

The reported annual losses through beekeepers – steadily ~20% and ceaselessly exceeding 30% in large-scale surveys – generally cite Varroa as a reason behind the losses and so helps the view that Varroa has a devastating affect on honey bees populations.

I stay sceptical of the strategies utilized in those annual surveys, their accuracy and the conclusions that may be drawn from them (however I don’t disagree in regards to the significance of Varroa) .

Does a discount in losses (have in mind those are self-reported and unverified) from 27% to 22% constitute a marked development in beekeeping?

After all no longer … it’s simply ‘noise’.

However, the frequency with which Varroa or the viruses it transmits – predominantly deformed wing virus (DWV) – is discussed as the rationale for the losses incurred obviously (albeit slightly unscientifically) helps the view that Varroa is dangerous information for bee populations.

After all, at a person degree, many beekeepers be told this lesson the laborious manner once they lose their colonies overwinter.

Santa Cruz Island

After which there was once the usage of Varroa to eliminate honey bees on Santa Cruz Island. Honey bees were presented to the island within the mid-19^th Century; inevitably swarms had been misplaced and become established as free-living colonies.

As a part of a bigger programme of non-native plant and animal eradication on Santa Cruz Island plans had been drawn up within the overdue 1980’s to do away with honey bees.

Bodily destruction of colonies and nest websites over a 5 12 months duration lowered the honey bee numbers through ~75%. Then again, the stragglers – most probably 50+ colonies – had been in inaccessible places.

Quite than open-feeding the use of poison-laced baits (which may have devastated local insect inhabitants as effectively) Varroa was once presented. For two-3 years honey bees remained provide however then, in 1997, they successfully disappeared from the island.

This timing suits with the identified affect on Varroa the place, if unchecked, mite quantity construct as much as devastating ranges over a few seasons.

After 1997 just one colony was once discovered (and destroyed) and no honey bees were detected at the island since 2004.

So … the creation of Varroa brought about the eradication of all of the honey bee inhabitants.

Neatly … no longer relatively.

• Initially, 75% of the colonies had already been ‘manually’ destroyed.
• Secondly, all colonies had been derived from a small selection of founding colonies so inbreeding – and the ensuing lack of colony health – was once most probably a contributing issue (and most likely would transform extra vital as colony numbers lowered).
• In any case, being an island, the inhabitants was once ‘closed’ without a probability of the creation of a few revitalising novel genetics.

Rebounding colony numbers

Even though Varroa most probably helped ‘end off’ the Santa Cruz honey bees there are different examples the place free-living colony numbers, despite the fact that most probably to begin with lowered (most likely hugely) after Varroa creation, due to this fact rebound.

Loose-living colonies within the Arnot wooded area

Thomas Seeley has studied honey bees within the Arnot wooded area in western New York State for a few years. Those research integrated surveying colony numbers and distribution in 1978, 2002 and 2011, a 33 12 months duration spanning the creation of Varroa (Seeley, 2007).

Significantly, colony density remained extensively unchanged (at ~1/km²) after the creation of Varroa, with the caveat that I’m no longer certain exactly when the mite arrived within the wooded area (it arrived in New York State in 1987). A precipitous drop in colony numbers could have befell however been adopted through a restoration duration during which numbers of the now mite-infested colonies higher to pre–Varroa ranges.

In some way this doesn’t subject … the purpose is that there stays a free-living inhabitants of honey bees at an identical densities to these sooner than the mite was once presented.

The absolute density – with colonies spaced ~1 km aside – perhaps displays the provision of nest websites (which I’ll speak about subsequent week) or the forage availability within the setting.

Blenheim bees

The Arnot wooded area bees are most probably one of the crucial highest studied in relation to numbers, distribution, pathogen ranges and attainable mechanisms of tolerance or resistance to Varroa, however they’re not at all the one free-living, mite-infested inhabitants of honey bees .

Nearer to house, I’ve up to now mentioned ‘historic’ populations of honey bees residing – unmanaged – in forest close to Oxford, UK. Whether or not they’re historic or no longer (and I believe no longer, each for causes defined in a apply up submit and since I’ve observed not anything extra in regards to the DNA evaluation in their genetic ‘distinctiveness’) doesn’t adjust the truth that there are bees in some woods … which brings me again to the outlet sentence of the creation.

Definitions

I used to be cautious in my selection of phrases for the outlet sentence of the primary paragraph.

Why are the copses, coppices and thickets of the United Kingdom (or for that subject Europe or a lot of North The united states) no longer stuffed with huge numbers of free-living honey bee nests?

That is the primary of 2 comparable posts on feral bees within the setting and with writing potency in thoughts I’m the use of the similar opening sentence for each.

Quite than live at the identified affect of Varroa and the viruses it transmits, I as an alternative need to speak about the numbers and placement of free-living honey bee colonies.

I additionally need to steer clear of the thorny matter of whether or not the bees that are provide within the woods are fresh escapees or were free-living for many years (or centuries as is every so often claimed, regardless of the truth there is also no supporting proof ).

Then again, a few of these distinctions are essential.

Wild vs. feral

Are the any ‘wild’ honey bees in continents the place huge numbers of controlled colonies exist? Varroa can decimate honey bee populations, the mite has a near-global distribution and beekeepers steadily lose swarms.

Since there are controlled colonies in all continents excluding Antarctica the outlet query of this segment may well be simplified to ’Do wild honey bees (Apis mellifera) nonetheless exist?

I don’t need to get slowed down within the difference between ‘wild’ colonies and those who have escaped control – through swarming – and will have to most likely subsequently be thought to be ‘feral’, outlined through the OED as:

Of an animal: Wild, untamed. Now ceaselessly carried out to animals or vegetation that experience lapsed right into a wild from a domesticated situation.

Except for in fact, bees aren’t actually domesticated (once more, OED’s definition, my daring textual content):

Of an animal: that has been tailored to are living in shut affiliation with and for the good thing about people, esp. via selective breeding through the years to adjust its behaviour, look, and so on.; tamed, no longer wild; saved as farm animals or as a puppy.

What a minefield!

Loose-living

In some way that is all semantics. When does a misplaced swarm (whether or not to begin with thought to be feral or no longer) transform wild?

As soon as it reproduces (swarms), probably the next 12 months?

Or after residing unmanaged for 3 generations, or 30, or 300?

Because of this astute readers will be aware that I’ve used the time period ‘free-living’ for almost all of this submit.

The time period encapsulates two essential ideas;

• loose i.e. no longer controlled or maintained.
• residing i.e. no longer demise … a elementary difference, essential each to the bees and in our working out in their standing. Many research display that just lately escaped swarms generally die inside of a 12 months or so. For instance, believe the colonies populating black woodpeckers nests in German beech forests (Kohl and Rutschmann, 2018). A free-living inhabitants will have to be self-sustaining and no longer reliant on the yearly inflow of swarms misplaced from (mis)controlled hives.

So, that’s what I’ll try to keep on with.

That is most likely a pity because the paper I need to speak about for the rest of the submit is titled:

Density of untamed honey bee, Apis mellifera, colonies international.

Oops.

This find out about (Visick and Ratnieks, 2023) is a meta-analysis of wild free-living honey bee colony densities around the globe.

A meta-analysis comes to the ‘statistical integration of proof from more than one research that deal with a commonplace analysis query’ . When attempting to attract large conclusions it is thought of as extra tough than unmarried case and even well-controlled experiments.

For instance may you draw any conclusions in regards to the numbers of free-living honey bee colonies in North The united states if the simplest information you had are from the 8-10 colonies provide within the small area of the Arnot wooded area that Thomas Seeley studied?

Neatly, you want to draw conclusions, however they most probably would no longer be very informative … or correct.

However should you had a dozen research from consultant and dispersed areas of North The united states, preferably performed through scientists the use of an identical strategies and with the similar rigour, then issues begin to get just a little extra significant.

Or, higher nonetheless, 200 research.

The mix of enormous numbers of research and the usage of similar and quantified strategies can produce actually compelling proof. That is the way in which some drug trials are analysed and validated, in research costing tens of hundreds of thousands of greenbacks .

However we don’t are living in a perfect global and honey bee analysis comes to tens of greenbacks, no longer tens of hundreds of thousands , so we need to take care of smaller numbers of research performed through other scientists the use of various strategies.

Visick and Ratnieks (2023) reviewed 40 research on colony density from 41 places around the globe. Those quite a lot of research had been printed in ~55 papers over a 50 12 months duration.

Estimates of free-living honey bee populations

Colony density was once made up our minds the use of direct (statement, bee-lining, native wisdom) or oblique (basically genetic evaluation of employees or of drones from drone congregation spaces) strategies and associated with the area during which the survey was once performed, the space surveyed, the native local weather and controlled colony numbers

Imply regional densities had been extremely variable, from 0.26/km² in Europe to six.8/km² in Africa. In North The united states the imply density was once 1.4/km².

Survey space

Density was once inversely associated with space surveyed (beneath above) which would possibly replicate survey bias; for instance, smaller bee-rich spaces could have been decided on, or the trouble had to find colonies in huge spaces was once no longer expended.

Evaluate the 2 diagrams beneath. At the left a ‘biased’ survey focusing simplest at the space with the pink border – which is 1/16^th the world of the blue sq. – would grossly overestimate colony density inside the blue border. Conversely (at the proper) since discovering simply one colony is time eating, huge survey spaces chance lacking nests, resulting in an underestimate of colony density.

Survey spaces of <1 km² had been excluded as some had wildly unrealistically top colony densities.

However what’s the ‘survey space’ in research which ‘not directly’ measured colony density through trapping employees or drones and analysing their genetic variety? For those the world was once assumed to be 4.5 km² for staff or 2.5 km² for drones. Those figures had been derived from reasonable queen or drone mating distances of 1600 m or ~900 m respectively .

Regional temperatures

Colony densities had been associated with temperature (see graph above), peaking at an average annual temperature of 23°C.

Temperature influences each the facility of bees to forage and the provision of forage right through the 12 months. Sub-tropical areas are prone to have extra forage to be had for longer classes of the 12 months and have temperatures higher fitted to foraging (which different research have proven is ~20°C).

Then again, in actually scorching spaces colony density was once lowered, probably because of different components like drought or the cooling effort had to save you comb cave in.

What’s the imply temperature in the United Kingdom?

I’ve assumed that Visick and Ratnieks are the use of the mathematics imply of the temperature, reasonably than every other type of imply and/or top daylight temperature. A part of the rationale I’ve assumed that is I’ve figures for UK reasonable temperatures:

It varies from 12 months to 12 months through some extent or so, it varies geographically and (although no longer proven on this determine) it’s inexorably emerging. 2003 was once moderately conventional for the remaining 20 years, 2013 was once strangely chilly and 2023 hotter than standard (a minimum of for the South and Midlands).

At 11-12°C our imply annual temperatures are effectively beneath optimal for honey bees. One reason why the temperature is so low is on account of our protracted cool/chilly winters.

Beekeepers know – and most likely some can be reminded of that is the following couple of weeks – that those winters can considerably scale back colony survival (subsequently additionally decreasing free-living colony densities).

Assumptions (once more) and conclusions

Inevitably, in a find out about bearing in mind international free-living honey bee densities, based totally upon paintings spanning a minimum of 50 years from more than one authors the use of various survey strategies, there are a lot of assumptions made.

For instance, nearly part of the Ecu research had been performed in huge geographic spaces the place colony numbers had been most probably underestimated.

However, if the regional colony densities are appropriate throughout each and every area, this meta-analysis means that overall free-living colony numbers is also two to 3 occasions upper than international controlled hive numbers (which lately exceed 102 million).

That sounds strangely top … however then I are living in one of the crucial in large part blue spaces within the maps above, so generally tend to not see too many colonies surviving outdoor a poly hive.

The United Kingdom has a space of ~250,000 km². Assuming the free-living colony density is 0.26/km² that might imply the ‘copses, coppices and thickets’ of this nation harbour about 65,000 colonies. For comparability, present numbers of controlled colonies exceed ~288,000 (i.e. a density of ~1.2/km²).

Strolling within the woods

Even though I’ve hardly ever intentionally looked for free-living colonies, I’ve walked many, many miles in Scotland and the Midlands over the past couple of a long time … and I’m moderately observant.

The Midlands in particular are densely populated with controlled hives (~275 apiaries inside of 10 km of mine, implying a controlled hive density of over 4/km²) and the beekeepers there inevitably lose huge numbers of swarms . In spite of this, I simplest hardly ever discovered free-living colonies, and their density would most probably were a lot not up to 0.26/km².

The few I’ve discovered have nearly all been in man-made constructions; church towers, college halls of place of dwelling, a warfare memorial and so on., without any that I will have in mind in ‘copses, coppices and thickets’.

Possibly I’m having a look within the flawed position?

I’ll go back to that matter subsequent week.

North The united states

Loose-living colonies in North The united states had been predicted to outnumber controlled hives 7:1, with the densities being 1.4 and nil.2/km2 respectively.

It’s honest to mention that there was once substantial scepticism about a few of these estimates on Bee-L, a dialogue board in large part populated through naturally aporetic scientific-leaning beekeepers based totally in large part in the United States.

Southern California may comprise huge numbers of free-living colonies, however unquestionably no longer the Pacific Northwest, the Dakota’s, Minnesota and Michigan (call to mind the winters!), or the damp North Atlantic seaboard?

Inevitably the Bee-L dialogue degenerated ended up debating the definition of ‘wild’, ‘feral’ and ‘free-living’.

Africa

Africa had a an identical free-living to controlled colony ratio to North The united states, however there are extra of each.

The biology of the honey bee (Apis mellifera scutellata) in Africa is attention-grabbing. The top temperatures imply that brood rearing and comb construction can happen year-round … if there may be enough forage and/or water to be had.

When there may be, the colonies enlarge however then generally tend to swarm sooner than they get very huge.

Then again, when forage or water are restricting – for instance because of an area drought – the colony migrates. It absconds, flying 10’s of kilometres to spaces with higher prerequisites.

The ‘swarminess’ of scutellata most probably accounts for the massive selection of free-living colonies. It additionally explains why beekeepers can hang around log hives with an expectation they’ll be occupied.

In any case, assume again to my submit two years in the past on honeyguides . It’s possible that this mutualistic dating may no longer have advanced with out huge numbers of free-living honey bee colonies.

The place are these kinds of free-living colonies?

How do those calculations of free-living honey bee colonies lend a hand?

If correct, or a minimum of extensively consultant, they’ll lend a hand in figuring out their contribution to ecosystem products and services i.e. human advantages from the herbal setting/ecosystem. For instance, crop pollination.

In a similar way, they will lend a hand perceive the affect of local weather exchange, pathogen creation and unfold, or herbal variety for illness resistance.

Then again, if they’re wildly faulty they’re prone to result in improper conclusions about those or different issues. Practice-up surveys are had to validate each the consequences that this meta-analysis are in line with, and to resolve how most often appropriate the consequences are.

Some readers would possibly realize that, paradoxically bearing in mind my remark about extrapolating North American numbers from the Arnot wooded area information, they’re about the similar!

The regional averages I’ve quoted are just a little deceptive. A determine of 0.26/km² in Europe does no longer imply you will have to anticipate finding one loose residing colony in each and every 4 km² searched (left, above). As an alternative, the distribution can be asymmetric, with native concentrations interspersed through huge empty spaces (proper, above).

Which of the ones ‘copses, coppices and thickets’ are occupied?

Within the submit subsequent week I will be able to speak about a technique of doubtless discovering those ‘native concentrations’, with no need to go looking the entire empty spaces.

---

References

Kohl, P.L., and Rutschmann, B. (2018) The left out bee bushes: Ecu beech forests as a house for feral honey bee colonies. PeerJ 6: e4602 https://peerj.com/articles/4602.

Seeley, T.D. (2007) Honey bees of the Arnot Woodland: a inhabitants of feral colonies persisting with Varroa destructor within the northeastern United States. Apidologie 38: 19–29 https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2006055.

Visick, O.D., and Ratnieks, F.L.W. (2023) Density of untamed honey bee, Apis mellifera, colonies international. Ecology and Evolution 13: e10609 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ece3.10609.