United States Honey Bee Colony Losses 2022-2023:
Initial Effects from the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership
Through: Nathalie Steinhauer, Mikayla Wilson, Dan Aurell, Selina Bruckner, Geoffrey Williams
Notice: It is a initial research. Pattern sizes and estimates are more likely to trade. A extra detailed ultimate document is being ready for e-newsletter in a peer-reviewed magazine at a later date. Earlier years’ peer-reviewed e-newsletter can also be accessed at the survey data web page: https://beeinformed.org/citizen-science/loss-and-management-survey/.
The Bee Knowledgeable Partnership (http://beeinformed.org) is a non-profit group that strives to enhance honey bee colony well being in the US by way of acting data-driven analysis in collaboration with beekeepers. Its imaginative and prescient is to create an atmosphere the place new and established beekeepers can also be a hit in keeping up wholesome honey bee colonies. One of the most group’s longest working methods, the nationwide Colony Loss and Control Survey, used to be initiated with the enhance of the Apiary Inspectors of The usa in 2007. Since then, it has monitored colony loss charges of controlled honey bees in the US (Bruckner et al., 2023), in addition to known chance elements and protecting measures related to well being, in particular as they relate to beekeeping leadership (Steinhauer, vanEngelsdorp and Saegerman, 2021). The survey is arranged in collaboration with the Bee Lab at Auburn College (https://aub.ie/bees) and the Bee Lab at College of Maryland (https://www.umdbeelab.com/).
Determine 1. Seasonal controlled honey bee colony loss charges in the US throughout years (A), and by way of operation sort (B-D): yard (managing as much as 50 colonies), sideline (managing 51-500), and business (managing >500 colonies) beekeepers. The loss charge used to be calculated as the overall collection of colonies misplaced divided by way of the collection of colonies in danger all over the season. Colonies in danger have been composed of dwelling colonies firstly of a length, in addition to new colonies made or obtained, whilst apart from colonies bought or parted with. Annual loss covers the entire length from one 1 April to the following 1 April (in purple); Summer time (1 April – 1 October, in yellow); Wintry weather (1 October – 1 April, in blue). Error bars constitute the 95% self assurance period acquired from a bootstrap resampling of the knowledge (n-out-of-n, 1000 rep).
The survey is a retrospective on-line questionnaire, which is dependent upon voluntary participation of beekeepers around the nation all over the month of April. The 2023 survey coated the only 12 months length between April 2022 and April 2023. Small scale beekeepers (1-50 colonies) and large-scale beekeepers (>50 colonies) took moderately other variations of the survey (survey query previews can also be discovered at https://beeinformed.org/citizen-science/loss-and-management-survey/).
This 12 months, 3,006 beekeepers from throughout the US equipped legitimate survey responses. Those beekeepers jointly controlled 314,360 colonies on 1 October 2022, representing 12% of the estimated 2.70 million controlled honey-producing colonies within the nation in 2022 (USDA NASS, 2023).
Colony loss charges have been calculated because the ratio of the collection of colonies misplaced to the collection of colonies controlled over an outlined length. Loss charges must no longer be interpreted as a transformation in inhabitants dimension, however are easiest interpreted as a mortality charge. Prime ranges of losses don’t essentially lead to a lower within the overall collection of colonies controlled in the US as a result of beekeepers can substitute misplaced colonies right through the 12 months.
All the way through Summer time 2022 (1 April 2022 – 1 October 2022), an estimated 24.9% [18.0 – 31.7, 95% bootstrapped confidence interval (CI) (Confidence intervals were obtained from the distribution of bootstrapped estimates for each group of respondents (n-out-of-n method, 1000 rep). Due to the stochastic nature of bootstrap analyses, 95% CI are expected to vary slightly at each computation.)] of controlled colonies have been misplaced in the US (Fig. 1). This used to be on par with fresh years. The Summer time loss charge used to be simply 1.1 share level (pp) upper than closing 12 months’s estimated Summer time colony loss (23.8% [16.7 – 31.5 CI]), and a pair of.2 pp upper than the common Summer time loss reported by way of beekeepers because the Summer time of 2010 (22.6%, 12-year reasonable), when Summer time losses have been first monitored.
All the way through Wintry weather 2022-2023 (1 October 2022 – 1 April 2023), an estimated 37.4% [28.6 – 48.1 CI] of controlled colonies in the US have been misplaced (Fig. 1). This Wintry weather loss charge used to be 13.2 pp in far more than the former Wintry weather loss charge (24.2% [20.3 – 29.9 CI]), and 9.1 pp upper than the common Wintry weather loss (28.2%, 15-year reasonable) reported by way of beekeepers because the get started of the survey in 2008, making 2022-2023 the second one perfect 12 months of Wintry weather loss after 2018-2019 (37.7% [26.5 – 50.6 CI]). The share of colony loss over the Wintry weather deemed “appropriate” by way of beekeepers used to be on reasonable 21.3% in 2022-2023, which used to be on par with the former 9 years all over which the suitable loss has hovered round 20%. In 2022-2023, over 60% of the surveyed beekeepers reported Wintry weather loss above this threshold.
Over all of the 12 months (1 April 2022 – 1 April 2023), beekeepers in the US misplaced an estimated 48.2% [40.7 – 56.0 CI] in their controlled honey bee colonies (Fig. 1). This used to be 9.2 pp upper than closing 12 months’s estimated annual loss (39.0% [31.6 – 47.7 CI]), just about as top as (2.6 pp not up to) the perfect annual loss on file (2020-2021, 50.8% [37.4 – 63.1 CI]), and eight.5 pp upper than the common loss charge (39.6%, 12-year reasonable) during the last 12 years.
Determine 2. Self-reported reasons of colony loss over Summer time 2022 (1 April – 1 October, in yellow) and Wintry weather 2022-23 (1 October – 1 April, in blue), as reported by way of U.S. beekeepers grouped by way of operation sort: yard (managing as much as 50 colonies), sideline (managing 51-500), and business (managing >500 colonies). Collection of respondents: yard (Summer time: 1,495, Wintry weather: 2,070), sideline (Summer time: 64, Wintry weather: 97) and business (Summer time: 35, Wintry weather 41) beekeepers. The arrow represents the share of beekeepers having decided on the particular explanation for loss in a listing of a couple of possible choices related to the query: “What elements do you suppose have been probably the most distinguished motive(s) of colony loss of life on your operation in [season]?”. Mistakes bars constitute the 95% self assurance period acquired from a bootstrap resampling of the knowledge (n-out-of-n, 100 rep). Legend: Insecticides (Non-apicultural insecticides); Pollen (Dietary pressure (pollen deprivation)); Predators (e.g. bears); Queen problems; Hunger (honey/nectar/sugar water); Varroa (varroa mites and related viruses); Climate (adversarial climate (e.g. drought, chilly snap)); DK (Don’t know). Solutions decided on by way of lower than 10% of respondents in all 3 teams aren’t proven. Different a couple of selection choices no longer indexed within the determine: Brood illnesses (e.g. AFB, EFB), Herbal crisis (e.g. storm, flood), Apicultural therapies (e.g. formic acid, amitraz), Delivery pressure (e.g. overheating, truck problems). Apparatus failure (e.g. moisture, air flow), Failure of environmental controls in sheds, Scavenger pests (e.g. small hive beetle, wax moth).
The honey bee trade in the US can also be loosely divided into 3 teams of beekeepers − yard (managing as much as 50 colonies), sideline (managing 51-500), and business (managing >500 colonies), with nearly all of colonies being controlled by way of business operations, although they’re a small share of beekeepers (1.4% of the surveyed beekeepers, who jointly controlled 89.7% of surveyed colonies in 2022-2023).
As in earlier years, yard beekeepers skilled the next annual charge of loss than business beekeepers in 2022-2023 (54.6% [52.2 – 57.2 CI] for yard vs 47.9% [39.9 – 56.4 CI] for business). This represented the next loss 12 months than reasonable for each yard beekeepers (5.8 pp greater than their 12-year reasonable of 48.8%) and business beekeepers (9.7 pp greater than their 12-year reasonable of 38.2%), however it sort of feels problems befell at other instances of the 12 months for the 2 teams.
Yard beekeepers once more skilled certainly one of their perfect Summer time losses on file (the closing 4 years categorised as the highest 4, 3, one and two, respectively, within the 13-year file), with 29.8% Summer time 2022 loss [26.9 – 33.4 CI], this used to be 10.0 pp over the former 12-year reasonable of nineteen.8%. Industrial beekeepers reported Summer time losses (24.7% [17.6 – 31.7 CI]) on par (1.8 pp over) with their reasonable over the former 12 years (22.8%).
Even though the loss charges of each teams have been similar for the Wintry weather season (37.8% [36.0 – 39.4 CI] for yard beekeepers, and 37.6% [28.1 – 49.1 CI] for business beekeepers), this represented a top loss season for the industrial team (10.7 pp over their 27.0% 15-year reasonable), however a mean season for yard beekeepers (0.2 pp not up to their 38.0% 15-year reasonable). Such top Wintry weather loss charges for business beekeepers have most effective been reported as soon as ahead of on this survey, in 2018-2019.
Probably the most distinguished explanation for colony loss of life reported by way of beekeepers over the Wintry weather 2022-23 used to be “varroa” (Varroa destructor, and its related viruses), for all 3 operation varieties (Fig. 2). Yard beekeepers then tended to quote “adversarial climate” and “hunger” (that means loss of honey, nectar, or sugar water) as the second one and 3rd maximum distinguished reasons of Wintry weather colony loss of their operations. Sideline beekeepers similarly cited “queen problems” and “hunger” as their 2d maximum distinguished explanation for Wintry weather loss. Industrial beekeepers cited similarly “queen problems” and “adversarial climate”.
Within the Summer time of 2022, probably the most distinguished explanation for colony loss of life reported by way of beekeepers of all operation varieties used to be “queen problems” (Fig. 2). Each yard and sideline beekeepers then indexed “varroa” and “adversarial climate”. Industrial beekeepers cited “varroa” as often as “queen problems” as their maximum distinguished reasons of loss over the Summer time, adopted by way of “adversarial climate”.
Even though the overall collection of honey bee colonies within the nation has remained rather strong during the last two decades (~2.6 million colonies in line with the USDA NASS Honey Stories), loss charges stay top, indicating that beekeepers are below considerable drive to get better from losses by way of developing new colonies annually. The Bee Knowledgeable Partnership’s annual Colony Loss and Control Survey gives the most important file of such loss charges skilled by way of beekeepers throughout the US each and every 12 months. Till the survey used to be introduced in 2007, there used to be no rigorous file of loss charges of controlled honey bee colonies, making it tricky to check losses towards ancient ranges.
To procure extra details about Bee Knowledgeable Partnership’s annual nationwide Colony Loss and Control Survey, discuss with: https://beeinformed.org/citizen-science/loss-and-management-survey/.
State stage estimates, together with estimates for single-state and multi-state operations, will probably be revealed on https://analysis.beeinformed.org/loss-map/.
Authors
Nathalie Steinhauer – Division of Entomology, College of Maryland, Faculty Park, MD, USA and Bee Knowledgeable Partnership, Faculty Park, MD, USA
Mikayla Wilson – Division of Entomology, College of Maryland, Faculty Park, MD, USA and Bee Knowledgeable Partnership, Faculty Park, MD, USA
Dan Aurell – Division of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn College, Auburn, AL, USA
Selina Bruckner – Division of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn College, Auburn, AL, USA
Geoffrey Williams – Division of Entomology & Plant Pathology, Auburn College, Auburn, AL, USA
Corresponding authors: [email protected] (NS) & [email protected] (GW)
References cited
Bruckner, S., Wilson, M., Aurell, D., Rennich, Okay., vanEngelsdorp, D., Steinhauer, N. and Williams, G.R. (2023) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee colony losses in the US: outcomes from the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership for 2017–18, 2018–19, and 2019–20’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 62(3), pp. 429–443. To be had at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2022.2158586.
Steinhauer, N., vanEngelsdorp, D. and Saegerman, C. (2021) ‘Prioritizing adjustments in leadership practices related to diminished iciness honey bee colony losses for US beekeepers’, Science of The Overall Surroundings, 753, p. 141629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141629
USDA NASS (2023) Honey (March 2023). ISSN: 1949-1492. To be had at: https://usda.library.cornell.edu/worry/publications/fq977t78v?locale=es (Accessed 16 June 2023).
Earlier survey outcomes
Aurell, D., Bruckner, S., Wilson, M., Steinhauer, N., Williams, G., for the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership (2022). United States Honey Bee Colony Losses 2021-2022: Initial Effects. https://beeinformed.org/2022/07/27/united-states-honey-bee-colony-losses-2021-2022-preliminary-results-from-the-bee-informed-partnership/ (Accessed 16 June 2023).
Steinhauer, N., Aurell, D., Bruckner, S., Wilson, M., Rennich, Okay., vanEngelsdorp, D., Williams, G., for the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership (2021). United States Honey Bee Colony Losses 2020-2021: Initial Effects. https://beeinformed.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/BIP_2020_21_Losses_Abstract_2021.06.14_FINAL_R1.pdf (Accessed 16 June 2023).
Kulhanek, Okay., Steinhauer, N., Rennich, Okay., Caron, D. M., Sagili, R. R., Pettis, J. S., Ellis, J. D., Wilson, M. E., Wilkes, J. T., Tarpy, D. R., Rose, R., Lee, Okay., Rangel, J. and vanEngelsdorp, D. (2017) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee 2015–2016 annual colony losses in the US’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 56(4), pp. 328–340. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/complete/10.1080/00218839.2017.1344496.
Lee, Okay. V., Steinhauer, N., Rennich, Okay., Wilson, M. E., Tarpy, D. R., Caron, D. M., Rose, R., Delaplane, Okay. S., Baylis, Okay., Lengerich, E. J., Pettis, J., Skinner, J. A., Wilkes, J. T., Sagili, R., vanEngelsdorp, D. and Partnership, for the B. I. (2015) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee 2013–2014 annual colony losses in the US’, Apidologie, pp. 1–14. https://hyperlink.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13592-015-0356-z.
Seitz, N., Traynor, Okay. S., Steinhauer, N., Rennich, Okay., Wilson, M. E., Ellis, J. D., Rose, R., Tarpy, D. R., Sagili, R. R., Caron, D. M., Delaplane, Okay. S., Rangel, J., Lee, Okay., Baylis, Okay., Wilkes, J. T., Skinner, J. A., Pettis, J. S. and vanEngelsdorp, D. (2015) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee 2014–2015 annual colony losses in the US’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 54(4), pp. 292–304. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/complete/10.1080/00218839.2016.1153294.
Spleen, A. M., Lengerich, E. J., Rennich, Okay., Caron, D., Rose, R., Pettis, J. S., Henson, M., Wilkes, J. T., Wilson, M., Stitzinger, J., Lee, Okay., Andree, M., Snyder, R., vanEngelsdorp, D., and for the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership (2013) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee 2011–12 iciness colony losses in the US: outcomes from the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 52(2), pp. 44–53. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3896/IBRA.1.52.2.07.
Steinhauer, N. A., Rennich, Okay., Wilson, M. E., Caron, D. M., Lengerich, E. J., Pettis, J. S., Rose, R., Skinner, J. A., Tarpy, D. R., Wilkes, J. T. and vanEngelsdorp, D. (2014) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee 2012-2013 annual colony losses in the US: outcomes from the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 53(1), pp. 1–18. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3896/IBRA.1.53.1.01.
vanEngelsdorp, D., Caron, D., Hayes, J., Underwood, R., Henson, M., Rennich, Okay., Spleen, A., Andree, M., Snyder, R., Lee, Okay., Roccasecca, Okay., Wilson, M., Wilkes, J., Lengerich, E. and Pettis, J. (2012) ‘A countrywide survey of controlled honey bee 2010-11 iciness colony losses in the US: outcomes from the Bee Knowledgeable Partnership’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 51(1), pp. 115–124. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3896/IBRA.1.51.1.14.
vanEngelsdorp, D., Hayes, J., Underwood, R. M., Caron, D. and Pettis, J. (2011) ‘A survey of controlled honey bee colony losses in the US, fall 2009 to iciness 2010’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 50(1), pp. 1–10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3896/IBRA.1.50.1.01.
vanEngelsdorp, D., Hayes, J., Underwood, R. M. and Pettis, J. (2008) ‘A Survey of Honey Bee Colony Losses within the U.S., Fall 2007 to Spring 2008’, PLoS ONE, 3(12). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?identification=10.1371/magazine.pone.0004071.
vanEngelsdorp, D., Hayes, J., Underwood, R. M. and Pettis, J. S. (2010) ‘A survey of honey bee colony losses in the US, fall 2008 to spring 2009’, Magazine of Apicultural Analysis, 49(1), pp. 7–14. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.03.
vanEngelsdorp, D., Underwood, R., Caron, D. and Hayes, J. (2007) ‘An estimate of controlled colony losses within the iciness of 2006-2007: A document commissioned by way of the apiary inspectors of The usa’, American Bee Magazine, 147(7), pp. 599–603.