Results of farrowing hut design on maternal, thermoregulatory habits – Swine abstracts


This learn about aimed to resolve the impact of 3 other farrowing huts at the behaviour of out of doors housed sows and piglets all the way through summer time in Japanese Canada, with a focal point on thermoregulatory and crushing behaviours. 40-two 2nd parity sows have been housed outdoor in teams of 3 all the way through lactation (N = 42). Inside every team, sows had get entry to to 3 farrowing huts: a Wooden changed A-frame hut, a Plastic spherical calf hutch, and a Steel ark English-style hut. Cameras have been put in within the huts to watch behaviour on days 1, 2, 7 and 14 of lactation. Temperature and humidity have been recorded inside and outside the huts. Hourly temperature averages have been analysed for the impact of the hut sort for day and evening one at a time. Sows farrowed within the huts between August and October and observations of sow and piglet location, posture, nursing, and crushing occasions have been accumulated within the morning and afternoon.


The Wooden huts confirmed the least variation in temperature between days and nights, with the Steel huts appearing identical thermal homes to the Wooden huts. The Plastic hut used to be warmer and drier all the way through the day, however cooler and extra humid all the way through the evening. No hut sort impact used to be noticed on sow use of the hut, posture, or nursing behaviour. Piglets confirmed higher expression of thermoregulating behaviour within the morning on day two within the Wooden hut because it used to be the best. Huddling used to be discovered to be the most typical methodology hired via piglets for thermoregulation in all huts, representing 61.2–73.8% in their time. Piglets have been in touch with the sow 10.6–16.1% of the time whilst no longer nursing. The chances of sows killing no less than one piglet via crushing or trauma all the way through the primary week after farrowing have been 93%, 86% and 43% for Wooden, Plastic, and Steel huts, respectively. Mortalities all the way through the primary week because of crushing or trauma have been 18%, 15%, and 11% of liveborn piglets for the Wooden, Plastic, and Steel huts, respectively. The riskiest time for piglets, relating to being overwhelmed used to be discovered to be when the sow used to be status.

Results of farrowing hut design on maternal, thermoregulatory habits – Swine abstracts


See also  Style, Custom and Red meat’s Dietary Energy - Swineweb.com

This learn about means that the indoor possibility elements for crushing exchange when sows are housed in huts. The Steel hut seems to be the most productive compromise taking into account thermal setting, behaviour, and clutter survival, however the effects counsel a necessity for long term analysis into hut designs for farrowing sows on pasture to scale back crushing dangers.

Conrad L, Aubé L, Heuchan E, Conte S, Bergeron R, Devillers N,
Results of farrowing hut design on maternal and thermoregulatory behaviour in out of doors housed sows and piglets. Carried out Animal Behaviour Science. 2022; 251: 105616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2022.105616.

Categories Pig

Leave a Comment