* * *
I started this essay by means of expressing dissatisfaction with the word “philosophy of paleontology.” Am I now ready to name myself a “thinker of palaetiology”? It’s not that i am. Some phrases go out of utilization for a explanation why, and whilst palaetiology isn’t an unsightly phrase, it does not precisely commute off the tongue.
Nonetheless, I’m susceptible to provide the last word to Whewell, who occurs to be one in every of my very favourite philosophers. So right here he’s, expounding the price of palaetiological science for a common, liberal schooling. After suggesting that “the chemical sciences (chemistry, mineralogy, electrochemistry) aren’t nowadays in a situation which makes them necessary common parts of a liberal schooling,” Whewell notes that there’s any other magnificence of sciences, the palaetiological, “which from the largeness in their perspectives and the exactness of the most productive parts in their reasonings are smartly suited to shape a part of that philosophical self-discipline which a liberal schooling ought to incorporate.”
Those [sciences], [including] ethnography, or comparative philology, and geology, are amongst the ones modern sciences that may be maximum correctly taken right into a liberal schooling as instructive cases of the broad and wealthy box of info and reasonings with which trendy science offers, nonetheless keeping, in a lot of its steps, nice rigour of evidence; and as an animating show additionally of the huge and grand vistas of time, succession, and causation, which can be open to the speculative powers of guy.
Let those phrases stand as an commercial for Extinct: The Philosophy of Palaetiology—er, Palaeontology—Weblog!
References
Bakewell, R. 18115. An Creation to Geology: Comprising the Components of the Science in its Provide Complicated State and all of the Contemporary Discoveries; with an Define of the Geology of England and Wales. London.
De l. a. Beche, H.T. 1834. Researches in Theoretical Geology. London: Charles Knight.
Fitton, W. 1817. “Transactions of the Geological Society, established 1807.” Edinburgh Evaluate 18:70– 94.
Hodge, M.J.S. 1991. “The historical past of the earth, lifestyles, and guy: Whewell and palaetiological science.” In M. Fisch and S. Schaffer (Eds.), William Whewell: A Composite Portrait, 253–288. Oxford: Oxford College Press.
Lyell, Charles. 1830. Ideas of Geology, Being an Try to Give an explanation for the Former Adjustments of the Earth’s Floor, by means of Connection with Reasons now in Operation (First Version). London: John Murray.
Rudwick, M.J.S. 1982. The Nice Devonian Controversy: The Shaping of Medical Wisdom Amongst Gentlemanly Consultants. Chicago: College of Chicago Press.
Rudwick, M.J.S. 2005. Bursting the Limits of Time: The Reconstruction of Geohistory within the Age of Revolution. Chicago: College of Chicago Press.
Whewell, W. 1831. “Lyell’s Ideas of Geology, Quantity 1.” British Critic and Quarterly Theological Evaluate 9: 180–206.
Whewell, W. 1837. Historical past of the Inductive Sciences, from the Earliest to the Provide Time. London: John W. Parker.
Whewell, W. 1840. Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Based upon their Historical past. London: John W. Parker.
For Some Further Assets on Whewell, see:
Snyder, L.J. 2006. Reforming Philosophy: A Victorian Debate on Science and Society. Chicago: College of Chicago Press.
Snyder, L.J. 2011. The Philosophical Breakfast Membership: 4 Outstanding Buddies who Reworked Science and Modified the International. New York: Broadway Books.
Quinn, A. 2016. “William Whewell’s Philosophy of Structure and the Historicization of Biology.” Research in Historical past and Philosophy of Organic and Biomedical Sciences 59: 11–19.
Quinn, A. 2017. “Whewell on Classification and Consilience.” Research in Historical past and Philosophy of Science Phase C: Research in Historical past and Philosophy of Organic and Biomedical Sciences 1:65–74.
Yeo, R. 1993. Defining Science: William Whewell, Herbal Wisdom, and Public Debate in Early Victorian Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge College Press.