Main British archaeologists and palaeontologists are caution that one of the vital country’s most important palaeolithic websites is underneath risk as a result of there isn’t sufficient law to give protection to it.
They’re calling for adjustments to the legislation amid fears that an important proof at a web site within the Cotswolds may well be misplaced to the United Kingdom for ever.
It used to be there that ice-age mammoths in an unusual state of preservation had been came upon, sparking pleasure in 2021 from Sir David Attenborough and different mavens.
The intensive stays of no less than one juvenile, two younger grownup and 6 absolutely grown grownup mammoths that roamed 200,000 years in the past had been unearthed at Cerney Wick, close to Swindon, in conjunction with gear utilized by Neanderthals, who almost definitely hunted those huge beasts.
A lot more used to be anticipated to be present in additional excavations as a result of just a fraction of the huge web site, a gravel quarry, were explored.
Now, simply as the major consultants from universities and nationwide museums had been making ready to go back – having pursued essential grants – they have got discovered themselves barred by way of the quarry proprietor.
DigVentures, a staff of archaeologists who give the general public alternatives to take part in excavations, dug the web site and coordinated the research and analysis with main mavens in 2021.
On the time co-founder Lisa Westcott Wilkins praised quarry house owners Hills Quarry Merchandise for permitting them so long as they wanted, whilst the corporate itself mentioned: “We can proceed to improve long term investigations.”
Now the Observer has observed an 18 July e mail despatched by way of Hills Quarry Merchandise to DigVentures telling them that get admission to to the web site “will not be to be had” and that they’re “officially asking for” the go back of unearths.
Westcott Wilkins advised the Observer that her team used to be in the long run powerless to forestall the web site being dug by way of any person else, including: “Higher coverage for those websites is paramount.”
She expressed frustration that any more unearths may well be taken away within the absence of law that may save you this. “Export licences can be tough to enforce on this case as a result of they don’t quilt bones except they’re altered by way of human hand or are obviously cultural goods.” She mentioned that different doable unearths, together with 5 tusks, are already visual throughout the layers.
There’s disbelief a few of the archaeologists concerned on the request to go back the unearths already exposed. A tusk is on show within the Bristol Museum, with the remaining in conservation. There had additionally been discussions about construction a public outreach centre to show the remainder of the gathering.
Assets throughout the archaeological neighborhood advised the Observer that their working out used to be that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is also related to the newest traits, possibly hoping to procure additional mammoth stays and Jurassic fossils for the brand new Herbal Historical past Museum Abu Dhabi. The UAE has been obtaining shows, reportedly purchasing a Tyrannosaurus rex skeleton for $31.8m in 2022.
The Observer approached the UAE Division of Tradition and Tourism for remark. The corporate that owns the web site, Hills Quarry Merchandise, grew to become down a request for remark.
A drone {photograph} taken closing Sunday means that the waterlogged quarry has been tired upfront of what some archaeologists concern might be a rushed seek for unearths.
Wilkins Westcott mentioned: “We’ve 5 primary universities as a part of our analysis consortium since the web site is so advanced and hard. That’s the experience you wish to have with a purpose to do any justice to this.”
after newsletter promotion
DigVentures was originally called in to lead the first detailed investigation of the site after a Neanderthal’s stone hand axe emerged. The initial discovery of the mammoth bones was made by amateur fossil hunters Sally and Neville Hollingsworth.
In 2021 the site was described by evolutionary biologist Prof Ben Garrod as “one of the most important discoveries in British palaentology”. The excavations also uncovered the remains of other ice-age giants, such as bison, elks and bears, as well as seeds, pollen and plant fossils – including extinct varieties – that could reveal a great deal about the environment then and how our Neanderthal ancestors lived in a period of prehistory about which little is known.
The exceptional discoveries were covered in a 2021 BBC One documentary, Attenborough and the Mammoth Graveyard, in which Sir David and Garrod joined archaeologists to film the excavation. The programme drew millions of viewers worldwide.
Garrod told the Observer this weekend: “When looking at something so complex – every grain of pollen or beetle wing case might tell us something – where finds range from the microscopic to, quite literally, mammoth in size, it takes a long-term, collaborative effort involving numerous stakeholders driven by expert knowledge and experience to fully understand the context.
“To lose a site like this now, just as it’s starting to reveal its secrets, would be devastating – not just in terms of knowing what happened there a quarter of a million years ago, but also for understanding how climate change will affect our environment both now and in the future.”
Prof Adrian Lister, the UK’s leading mammoth expert and a palaeobiologist at London’s Natural History Museum, said: “The site may demonstrate the final stages in the evolution of the woolly mammoth, one of the most iconic of ice-age species. We need a controlled excavation and for the remains to stay here, available for study.”
Historic England, one of the organisations that offered grants for the initial excavation, would not have the authority to control any new digging. Mel Barge, its inspector of ancient monuments in the south-west, said: “Historic England’s role is to protect our built heritage, which includes archaeological sites. Based on our current understanding, these remains are not protected under planning law because there is no structure on the site or clear evidence that these remains were shaped by human activity. We would welcome further discussions with the owner.”